Que el periodismo ambiental sea visible: la formación profesional de los periodistas agrícolas en Taiwán

Contenido principal del artículo

Shih-Hsien Hsu
Tsai-Hsuan Lin

Resumen

Este estudio explora cómo los periodistas profesionales en Taiwán cultivan y mantienen la profesionalidad en el periodismo agrícola y ambiental, campos históricamente marginados en los medios de comunicación tradicionales. Mediante un enfoque cualitativo que integra el modelo experto–principiante y la jerarquía de influencias, se seleccionaron seis periodistas de medios independientes como muestra saturada para entrevistas en profundidad realizadas en 2023. Los hallazgos revelan que la profesionalidad se desarrolla a través de una inmersión prolongada en el campo, el aprendizaje autodirigido y la tutoría basada en los principios de verdad, equidad e interés público. Los medios independientes fomentan la autonomía y la colaboración, pero enfrentan limitaciones como recursos reducidos, exigencias de multitarea y riesgo de agotamiento. A pesar de estos desafíos, los periodistas han ampliado la cobertura agrícola hacia el periodismo ambiental, influyendo en la conciencia pública, impulsando respuestas políticas y promoviendo el discurso sobre sostenibilidad. El estudio subraya cómo la profesionalidad, la pasión y el apoyo institucional refuerzan la función democrática del periodismo al abordar la justicia agrícola y ambiental.


 

Palabras clave:
periodismo ambiental, periodista agrícola, profesionalismo periodístico, experto-principiante, modelo de jerarquía de influencias


Detalles del artículo

Sección

Investigación e innovación

Cómo citar

Hsu, S.-H., & Lin, T.-H. (2025). Que el periodismo ambiental sea visible: la formación profesional de los periodistas agrícolas en Taiwán. MEDIACIONES, 21(35), 150-175. https://doi.org/10.26620/uniminuto.mediaciones.21.35.2025.%p

Referencias

Beam, R. A. (2003). Content differences between daily newspapers with strong and weak market orientations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 368–390.

https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000209

Breed, W. (1955). Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces, 33(4), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2573002

Bimber, B., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society, 22(4), 700–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893980

Chen, P.-L. (2004). How journalists collect data? A preliminary study of expert knowledge. Journal of Library and Information Science, 51, 35–48. (in Chinese)

Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Chiang, C.-C. (2022). Daily news verification as organizational work: A study of Taiwan’s four major newspapers. Journal of Communication Research and Practice, 12(1), 113–152. (in Chinese)

Chiang, C.-C. (2009). Analysis on the broadcast news interviewers’ imagination of the ‘audience’: A discursive psychological approach. Mass Communication Research, 99, 119–168. (in Chinese)

Chien, Y.-F. (1998). A study on the conceptual structure and indicators of journalistic professionalism [Doctoral dissertation, National Chengchi University]. (in Chinese)

Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90146-4

Chung, W.-W. (1994). How do journalists ask questions? Asking good and right questions. In Dialogue between Journalism and Art (pp. 1–20). Taipei: Graduate Institute of Journalism, National Chengchi University. (in Chinese)

Chung, W.-W. (1997). The nature of journalists’ knowledge: A comparison between experts and novices (II) [Research report]. National Science Council. (in Chinese)

Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815

Ferrucci, P. (2015). Public journalism no more: The digitally native news nonprofit and public service journalism. Journalism, 16(7), 904–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914549123

Ferrucci, P. (2018). “We’ve lost the basics”: Perceptions of journalism education from veterans in the field. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 73(4), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695817731870

Ferrucci, P., & Kuhn, T. (2022). Remodeling the hierarchy: An organization-centric model of influence for media sociology research. Journalism Studies, 23(4), 525–543.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2032805

Ferrucci, P., & Vos, T. (2017). Who’s in, who’s out? Constructing the identity of digital journalists. Digital Journalism, 5(7), 868–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1208054

Jaakkola, M., Hellman, H., Koljonen, K., & Väliverronen, J. (2015). Liquid modern journalism with a difference: The changing professional ethos of cultural journalism. Journalism Practice, 9(6), 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1051361

Liang, Y.-F. (1990). A study on news schema: Differences in knowledge structure between experts and novices [Master’s thesis, National Chengchi University]. (in Chinese)

Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226–251.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2392453

Luo, W.-H. (1995). A study on professional values of journalists [Research report]. National Science Council. Taipei: National Chengchi University. (in Chinese)

Nayman, O. B. (1973). Professional orientations of journalists: An introduction to communicator analysis studies. International Communication Gazette, 19(4), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/001654927301900401

Nielsen, R. K., & Ganter, S. A. (2018). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1600–1617.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817701318

Pickard, V. (2020). Restructuring democratic infrastructures: A policy approach to the journalism crisis. Digital Journalism, 8(6), 704–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1733433

Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1976). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning. Center for Human Information Processing, Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego.

Ryfe, D. M. (2009). Broader and deeper: A study of newsroom culture in a time of change. Journalism, 10(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884908100601

Stocking, S. H., & Gross, P. H. (1989). How do journalists think? A proposal for the study of cognitive bias in newsmaking. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.

Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

Reese, S. D., & Shoemaker, P. J. (2016). A media sociology for the networked public sphere: The hierarchy of influences model. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 389–410. doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1174268

Weaver, D. H., & Willnat, L. (Eds.). (2012). The global journalist in the 21st century (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Routledge.

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2006). Mass media research: An introduction (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.

Artículos similares

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.