HAVING EXCELLENT TEACHERS. A key to cutting-edge research
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper brings forth a ceteris paribus claim, namely good researchers have always had very good teachers. The claim is supported by three arguments, as follows: the first one, argues that doing research cannot be and should be taught. This argument is a critique of all algorithmic understandings of research. Hence, it becomes necessary to take a look at the origins of the problem, thus: the methodology of research is to be found in I. Lakatos’s works. The second argument presents five examples of outstanding researchers that had excellent teachers. The third argument highlights the importance of the participation of researchers in academic and scientific networks, for good teachers are to be found there, too. This argument is really a call to deschooling of research. At the end some conclusions are drawn.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Agassi, J., (2014). Popper and his Popular Critics. Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyereabend and Imre Lakatos. Springer Verlag
Cereijido, M., (2004). Por qué no tenemos ciencia. Siglo Veintiuno Editores
Heidegger, M., (1971). Was heisst denken? Max Niemeyer Verlag
Lakatos, I., (2012). The Methodology of Scientifc Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press; disponible en: https://www-cambridge-org.translate.goog/core/books/methodology-of-scientific-research-programmes/8DBCEFE34A59BAD3D393FB958A4DC5FC?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=es&_x_tr_hl=es&_x_tr_pto=tc
Maldonado, C. E., (2023). “Cuatro modos insurgentes de justificación de la investigación”, en: Revista de Epistemología y Ciencias Sociales, No. 16, agosto, págs. 14-30; ISSN 1852-625X; disponible en: https://www.revistaepistemologia.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/www.revistaepistemologia.com.ar-revista-completa-numero-16-con-7-articulos-editada.pdf
Prigogine, I. (2003). Is Future Given? World Scientific
Stadler, F., (2011). El Círculo de Viena. Empirismo lógico, ciencia, cultura y política. F.C.E.-U niversidad Autónoma Metropolitana
Worrall, J., (2009). “Normal Science and Dogmatism, Paradigms and Progress: Kuhn ‘versus’ Popper and Lakatos”, en: Nickles, T., (Ed.), Thomas Kuhn, Cambridge University Press, págs. 65-100. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613975.005