Discourses on humor, freedom of expression, and offense in articles published by two Brazilian newspapers between 2012 and 2016

Main Article Content

Nara Lya Cabral Scabin

Abstract

This paper performs a discursive analysis of discourses on humor, freedom of expression, and offense in two important Brazilian newspapers. Journalistic articles published in Folhade S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo between 2012 and 2016 are examined. We demonstrate that controversies related to humorous expression in public debate are marked by discourses on collisions between fundamental rights. The analyzed corpus is composed of 36 texts, in which a predominance of a liberal discourse on freedom of expression predominates. Our discussion of the findings indicates that journalistic material is characterized by the invisibilization or the framing of the other through simplistic categories. In conclusion, we discuss the role of communication field in such debates, highlighting the urgent need of a media criticism that is ethically committed to the representation of otherness.

Author Biography

Nara Lya Cabral Scabin

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7121-1142
Doctora en Ciencias de la
Comunicación.
Escuela de Comunicaciones y Artes de
la Universidad de São Paulo
Brasil

References

Barendt, E. (2007). Freedom of speech. Oxford University Press.
Bucci, E. (2015). “A primeira vítima é o humor”. In: O Estado de S. Paulo, São Paulo. .
Ceccon, C. (2015). “Novos desafios para Charlie”. In: Folha de S. Paulo, São Paulo. Available at: safios-para-charlie.shtml>.
Charaudeau, P. (2010). Discurso das mídias. Contexto.
Charaudeau, P.; Maingueneau, D. (2008). Dicionário de Análise do Discurso. Contexto.
Folha de S. P. (2015). “7 de janeiro”. In: Folha de S. Paulo, São Paulo. .
Foucalt, M. (1981). “The order of discourse”. In: Young, R. Untying the text: a post-structuralist reader. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Fraser, N.; Honneth, A. (2006). ¿Redistribución o reconocimiento? Morata.
Hall, S. (1994). “Some ‘politically incorrect’ pathways through PC”. In: DUNANT, S. (ed.). The war of the words: The political correctness debate. London: Virago, p. 164-183. .
Maingueneau, D. (2008). Gênese dos Discursos. Parábola.
Mendes, C. H. (2012). “A piada que oprime”. In: O Estado de S. Paulo, São Paulo. .
Mondal, A. (2014). Islam and controversy. The politics of free speech after Rushdie.Palgrave Macmillan.
Pondé, L. F. (2014). “The Clash”. In: Folha de S. Paulo, São Paulo. .
Prata, Antônio. (2012). “KKK!” In: Folha de S. Paulo, São Paulo. .