development of computational thinking in education students using robot programming
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examinates the fist impressions of the students regarding computational thinking and how, when implementing a didactic unit based in robots programming, enhances this knowledge and skills for the XXI Century.
The research allows to describe some wrong perceptions about computational thinking, previous to the implementation of the didactic units and compare them with the archievements obtained at the end of the process. In addition, it was seen an increase in the confidence of the students regarding technological and algorithmic exercices. this findigns support the objectives of the research, where is evident that robot programming is effective to imrpove the computational thinking of middle school students, as well as the importance of culture prolem silving skills and critical thinging for the society.
References
Bono, E. (1992). Pensamiento creativo. Paidós. https://www.buscalibre.com.co/libro-el-pensamiento-creativo/9788449332470/p/47572051
Botero, J. (2018). Introducción a una nueva forma de enseñar y aprender. Educación STEM. Bogotá: STILO IMPRESORES LTDA. https://www.compartirpalabramaestra.org/recursos/libros/educacion-stem-introduccion-una-nueva-forma-de-ensenar-y-aprender
Brennan, W. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Vancouver: Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cook, S. (1971). The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. California: Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing.
Grover, S. &. (2017). Research on K-12 Computer Science Education: The Field, the Curriculum and Their Instructional Practices. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883035522000866
Hernandez Sampieri, R. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill Education.
Hofstadter, D. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books.
Knuth, D. (1997). The art of computer programming: Fundamental algorithms. Addison-Wesley.
Liskov, & H., B. (1975). Programming with abstract data types. ACM Sigplan Notices, 10(8).
Nacional, M. d. (2022). Orientaciones curriculares para el área de tecnología e informatica en educación básica y media. Bogotá, Colombia: MEN.
NACIONAL, M. D. (2022). ORIENTACIONES CURRICULARES PARA EL ÁREA DE TECNOLOGÍA E INFORMÁTICA EN LA EDUCACIÓN BÁSICA Y MEDIA. Bogotá: Ministerio de Educación Nacional.
Ortega Ruipérez, B., & Asensio Brouard, M. M. (2018). Robótica DIY: pensamiento computacional para mejorar la resolución de problemas. En Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 17(2) (págs. 56 - 58). España: Revista Electrónica de Tecnología en Educación.
Osborn, A. (1953). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Osborn, A. (1958). Creative Problem Solving: The Basic Course. . New York: Creative Education Foundation Press.
Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
Pólya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Román González, M., Jiménez Fernández, C., & Pérez González , J. C. (2016). Codigoalfabetización y pensamiento computacional en Educación Primaria y Secundaria: validación de un instrumento y evaluación de programas. En R. d. Educación, Revista de Investigación en Educación, 18(2) (págs. 135-156). Madrid, España: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia .
Simon, H. (1957). Models of man; social and rational: mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Simon, H. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM. En Revista insignia de ACM (págs. 33 - 35). New York: Moshe Y. Vardi.