Analysis of Strategic and Sociolinguistic Competences Elicited Through Online Chat Activities
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents the results of an interpretive case study of a group of students in the English Basic V course from the Philology and Languages, English Bachelor’s degree program at the Universidad Nacional. The study relates the analysis of students’ sociolinguistic and strategic competences elicited through chat-based activities aimed at developing and practicing these two competences. It can be useful for teachers of English as a pedagogical resource to practice communicative skills with students in an innovative way and for researchers investigating the development of different English communicative competences in a ludic way using online chat.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Bachman, L.F. (1990). Chapter 4: Communicative Language Ability. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing (pp.81-109). Oxford: England. Oxford University Press.
Bagarić, V (2007). Defining Communicative Competence. Metodika. Vol. 8, br. 1, 2007, page 94-103.
Broersma, D. H. (2004). What is Sociolinguistic Competence? Why is it Important? Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL 60187-5593. Retrieved October 2005. From http://www.wheaton.edu/bgc/icct/
CEF (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Language Policy Unit, Strasbourg. Retrieved from ww.coe.int/lang-CE
Colburn, M. C. (2002). Strategic Interaction Online: A Comparison of Instructional Techniques to Optimize the Use of Scenarios as a Distance Learning Exercise on the Internet. Delaware: University of Delaware.
Collot, M., and Belmore, N. (1996). Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S.C. Herring (Ed.), Computermediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 13-28). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking in order to facilitate the acquisition of the interactive competence. System, 22(1). 17-31.
Denzin, N. (1989). Strategies of Multiple Triangulations. The Research Act: A theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods.
Foolen, A.P. (1997). The Expressive Function of Language: Towards A Cognitive Semantic Approach. In Niemeier, S.; Dirven, R. (ed.), The Language of Emotions, pp. 15-31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1975). Explorations in the Functions of Language. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd., 25 Hill Street, London.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1995). A Recent View of ‘Missteps’ in Linguistic Theory. Functions of Language 2.2. Vol. 3 of The Collected Works, p. 236.
Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476. New York: Cambridge U Press.
Oliva, M. and Pollastrini, Y. (1995). Internet resources and second language acquisition: An evaluation of virtual immersion. Foreign Language Annals Magazine, 28(4), 551-563. New York: Cambridge.
Richards, J., J. Platt, and H. Weber. (1985). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.
Pelletieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice. Edited by Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. New York: Cambridge University Press.