Reflections on the Concept of Quality in Editorial Management
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article takes the form of a theoretical-critical essay that offers a conceptual reflection on the notion of quality in academic editorial management, understood as a relational, historical, and situated concept. The text seeks to critically problematize the hegemonic meanings of quality in contemporary scientific publishing. First, it analyzes the concept of quality as a relational and contextual category, dependent on the aims and purposes that guide action, and distinguishes it from the notion of cualidad, understood as the singular character of something. Second, it questions the very possibility of speaking about editorial quality in a global context shaped by power structures and hegemonic evaluation models which, from industrialization to the contemporary university, have transformed quality into a device of control and standardization.
Article Details
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Ampudia de Haro, F. A. (2021). Indexación y factor de impacto: La academia y sus cajas negras. Athenea Digital, 21(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.2752
Beigel, F., Gallardo, O., & Bekerman, F. (2018). Institutional expansion and scientific development in the periphery: The structural heterogeneity of Argentina’s academic field. Minerva, 56(3), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9340-2
Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment. (2022). Agreement on reforming research assessment (CoARA).
https://www.coara.org/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/
Declaración de San Francisco sobre la Evaluación de la Investigación (DORA). (2013). Declaración DORA (versión en español). https://sfdora.org/read/
Díez-Gutiérrez, E. J. (2025). Capitalismo académico en la Universidad: la privatización y mercantilización de la Uber-sidad neoliberal en la era digital. En K. Caballero & J. Mula-Falcón (Coords.), Neoliberalismo y educación superior (pp. 13–50). Octaedro. https://doi.org/10.36006/09575-1
European Ministers of Education. (1999). The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999.
Giménez-Toledo, E. (2015). La evaluación de la producción científica: breve análisis crítico. RELIEVE: Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.1.5160
Harvey, L. (2005). A history and critique of quality evaluation in the UK. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510700608
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
Karp Mitastein, S. (Dir.). (2016). De libros, conocimiento y otras adicciones: La edición universitaria en América Latina. Universidad de Guadalajara; Asociación de Editoriales Universitarias de América Latina y el Caribe (EULAC). https://doi.org/10.32870/9786077426349
Lemaitre, M. J. (Coord.). (2018). La educación superior como parte del sistema educativo en América Latina y el Caribe: Calidad y aseguramiento de la calidad. UNESCO-IESALC / Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372632
Quijano, A. (2000). Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580. https://www.decolonialtranslation.com/espanol/quijano-colonialidad-del-poder.pdf
Real Academia Española. (s. f.). Diccionario de la lengua española (23.ª ed.). https://dle.rae.es
Santos, B. de S. (2018). Epistemologías del Sur. En M. P. Meneses & K. Bidaseca (Coord.), Epistemologías del Sur / Epistemologias do Sul (pp. xx–xx). CLACSO. https://www.biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20181124092336/Epistemologias_del_sur_2018.pdf
UNESCO. (2015). Research evaluation metrics (Open access for researchers, Module 4). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232210