Some Remarks on Aristotelianized Critical Thinking
Article Sidebar
Downloads
Article Details
Altmetrics
Se solicita a los autores que diligencien el documento de cesión de derechos de autor sobre el artículo, para que sea posible su edición, publicación y distribución en cualquier medio y modalidad: medios electrónicos, CD ROM, impresos o cualquier otra forma, con fines exclusivamente científicos, educativos y culturales
- La obra pertenece a UNIMINUTO.
- Dada la naturaleza de UNIMINUTO como Institución de Educación Superior, con un modelo universitario innovador para ofrecer Educación de alta calidad, de fácil acceso, integral y flexible; para formar profesionales altamente competentes, éticamente responsables y líderes de procesos de transformación social, EL CEDENTE ha decidido ceder los derechos patrimoniales de su OBRA, que adelante se detalla para que sea explotado por ésta
- El querer de EL CEDENTE es ceder a título gratuito los derechos patrimoniales de la OBRA a UNIMINUTO con fines académicos.
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this contribution we recover some ideas from the Aristotelian logic method in order to observe some of its qualities within the teaching of critical thinking. To achieve this goal, we follow two steps: first we expound a model of critical thinking that we call Aristotelianized critical thinking and then we show the results of an experiment using this model. With this
we offer some empirical evidence of the favorable performance of a group of students trained in an Aristotelianized critical thinking course, especially in the face of irrelevance.
References
Castro-Manzano, J.M. (2021). Traditional logic and computational thinking. Philosophies, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6010012
Copi, I. y Cohen, C. (2007). Introducción a la lógica. Limusa.
Englebretsen, G. (2013). Robust reality: an essay in formal ontology. De Gruyter.
Englebretsen, G. (2017). Bare facts and naked truths: a new correspondence theory of Truth. Taylor & Francis.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
Evans, J. St. B. T, Barston, J. L., y Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196976
Hitchcock, D. (2018). Critical Thinking. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/critical-thinking/
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2010). Mental models and human reasoning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(43), 1–8.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012933107
Losee, J. (2001). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science. Oxford University Press.
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., y Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 653–684. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_4
Thom, P. (2007). Logic and ontology in the syllogistic of Robert Kilwardby. Brill.
Woods, J. (2016). Logic naturalized. En J. Redmond, O. Pombo Martins, Á. Nepomuceno Fernández (Eds.), Epistemology, Knowledge and the impact of interaction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26506-3_18