Not everything is as we have learned epistemological obstructions of inclusive education

Main Article Content

Aldo Ocampo González

Abstract

On this occasion I analyze some fundamental oppressions that affect the academic genre indexed as inclusive education. To this end, I maintain that what we know as inclusive education is not such a thing. We only know a pseudoheuristic disguise that imposes the founding paradigms of special education, its didactic and epistemological model to strategically fill in a blank space. What we name through the phrase ‘inclusive education’ is nothing more than a system of arbitrary transliteration of diverse bodies of knowledge, categorical forms and methodological repertoires typical of special education, co-opting defining signs - identity and face - of inclusive education. We are in the presence of a research territory that wanders with great force through various academic structures, ethical commitments and political projects – many of them, of dubious reputation – without knowing who it is. The work concludes by observing that taking special education as inclusive education is making the same mistake. 

Keywords:
Inclusive education, Analysis problems, Epistemology, Construction of knowledge

References

Bal, M. (2009). Conceptos viajeros en las humanidades. Una guía de viaje. Murcia: Cendeac.

Best, S. & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern Theory. London: Guilford Publications.

Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorfosis. Hacia una teoría materialista del devenir. Madrid: Akal.

Braidotti, R. (2006). Feminismo, diferencia sexual y subjetividad nómade. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Braidotti, R. (2009). Transposiciones. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Corona, J. (2018). La ontología del presente. Valenciana, [s.l.], v. 22, n. 11, p. 315-322, 2018. Recuperado el 02 de mayo de 2020 de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/valencia/v11n21/2007-2538-valencia-11-21-315.pdf.

Chambers, I. (2009). La cultura después del humanismo. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.

Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: theory, applications, and praxis. Signs 38, 785–810.

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1968). Mil mesetas. México: FCE.

Esperón, J. P. (2016). Heidegger, Deleuze y la diferencia. Aportes para pensar la irrupción de la novedad. AISTHESIS, Nº 59, 143-156.

González, B. (2018). La ética diferencial de Rosi Braidotti. Agora. Papeles de filosofía, 37 (2), 173-191.

Lazzarato, M. (2006). Por una política menor. Acontecimiento y política en las sociedades de control. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.

Mouffe, Ch. (2007). En torno a lo político. Comunidad, ciudadanía, pluralismo y democracia radical. Buenos Aires: FCE.

Ocampo, A. (2017). Epistemología de la educación inclusiva. Granada: UGR.

Ocampo, A. (2018). La formación del profesorado y la comprensión epistemológica de la educación inclusiva: tensiones, permeabilidades y contingencias. Santiago: Fondo Editorial CELEI.

Ocampo, A. (2019). Contornos teóricos de la educación inclusiva. Boletín Redipe, [s.l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. 66-95.

Ocampo, A. (2020). Inclusión como método. Revista Atos de Pesquisa em Educação, V.15, n.1, 1-30.

Ocampo, A. (2024). “Problemas fundamentales de la educación inclusiva”; en: Vercellino, S., Ocampo, A. & Arciniegas, M.L. (Comps.). Estudios sobre Educación Inclusiva em Latinoamérica. (pp.16-83). Santiago: Fondo Editorial CELEI.

Oppermann, S. (2011). Ecocriticism’s theoretical discontents. Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, [s.l.], v. 44, n. 2, p. 153-169. Recuerado el 12 de agosto de 2020 de:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236830201_Ecocriticism’s_Theoretical_Discontents. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2020.

Perea, A. (2011). La ontología crítica del presente de Michel Foucault como heterotopología de la subjetividad moderna. Tesis (Doctoral) – Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá.

Spivak, G. (2006). Crítica de la razón postcolonial. Hacia una historia del presente evanescente. Madrid: Akal.