Level of knowledge in maintenance resource management (MRM) in Colombian AIR Force Base of CACOM-3
Article Sidebar
Downloads
Article Details
Altmetrics
Se solicita a los autores que diligencien el documento de cesión de derechos de autor sobre el artículo, para que sea posible su edición, publicación y distribución en cualquier medio y modalidad: medios electrónicos, CD ROM, impresos o cualquier otra forma, con fines exclusivamente científicos, educativos y culturales
- La obra pertenece a UNIMINUTO.
- Dada la naturaleza de UNIMINUTO como Institución de Educación Superior, con un modelo universitario innovador para ofrecer Educación de alta calidad, de fácil acceso, integral y flexible; para formar profesionales altamente competentes, éticamente responsables y líderes de procesos de transformación social, EL CEDENTE ha decidido ceder los derechos patrimoniales de su OBRA, que adelante se detalla para que sea explotado por ésta
- El querer de EL CEDENTE es ceder a título gratuito los derechos patrimoniales de la OBRA a UNIMINUTO con fines académicos.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the level of knowledge in Maintenance Resource Management (MRM), which currently has the technical personnel that works in aircraft maintenance A-37B, A-29, C-95, SR-560, C-208 and B 212 in the Colombian Air Force (FAC) in the Combat Air Command No. 3 (CACOM-3), seeking to further improve Operational Safety within the Force.
The procedure established to determine the level of knowledge in (MRM) consisted in designing a data collection instrument in Safety Management System (SMS), Human Factors (HF) and current FAC Regulations (Maintenance Manual and Technical Messages) [8], as fundamental aspects for an operational environment managed under the culture of an integrated MRM system in the FAC. With this information, we established statistically what are the weakest aspects of knowledge in the personnel of Maintenance Officers, Inspectors, Group Heads and Operators who work in the aeronautical maintenance process under the same parameters. Finally, the results of the analysis of the obtained information are presented and it is concluded with the level of knowledge in Operational Safety and Management of Maintenance Resources in the Combat Air Command No. 3.
References
[2] FAC-O-MASEO. (2010). Manual de Gestión en Seguridad Operacional para la Fuerza Aérea Colombiana primera edición 2010, Bogota: FAC. p 21-32.
[3] Erazo, G., y Estrada, E. (Comp.); Rodríguez, G. (Dir.); Solano, M. (Ed.). (2015). Estudios de Seguridad Operacional, una Mirada desde la Academia. Compilación de artículos de revisión sobre Seguridad Operacional. Primera edición. Colección Ciencia y Poder Aéreo No. 9. Bogotá, Colombia: Escuela de Postgrados de la Fuerza Aérea Colombiana.
[4] FAC-IGEFA. (2016). QRH Guia Rapida de Seguridad Operacional FAC. Bogota: FAC p(91).
[5] SKYBRARY. (20 de 09 de 2016). www.skybrary.aero. Obtenido de www.skybrary.aero: https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Human_Factors_Analysis_and_Classification_System_(HFACS)
[6] Chun-Yong Kim, B.-H. S. (2015). A Study on Safety Culture in Aviation Maintenance Organization. Gunsan, Korea: Department of Defense Science & Technology, Howon University.
[7] K.A. Pettersen, K. A. (2007). Explaining safe work practices in aviation line maintenance. Stavanger, Norway: El Seviere.
[8] Kanki, B. G. (2010). Human factors in aviation. USA: Elsevier Inc NASA.
[9] Lozano Alvernia, E. (. (2008). La seguridad en la aviación depende de los factores humanos. . Bogota: Ciencia Y Poder Aéreo, 3(1), 37-39. https://doi.org/10.18667/cienciaypoderaereo.65.
[10] Siao, D. H. (2015). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS. Tennessee, USA : College of Basic and Applied Sciences Middle Tennessee State University.
[11] Patankar, J. C. (2001). Four generations of maintenance resource management program in the United States: and analysis of the past, present and future. Jornalist of air transportation world wide, p. 4.
[12] Robertson, M. (31 de 01 de 2005). www.faa.gov. Obtenido de www.faa.gov: https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/maintenance_hf/library/documents/media/human_factors_maintenance/human_factors_guide_for_aviation_maintenance_-_chapter_16.maintenance_resource_management.pdf p.2.
[13] Hernández, R. F. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. México: Mc Graw Hill p-cap 2,3 y 4.
[14] Cordero, Z. R. (2009). LA INVESTIGACIÓN APLICADA: UNA FORMA DE CONOCER. Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica.
[15] Ortega, S. (2018). Modulo 3 Metodologia de la Investigación MAESO . Bogota, DC.: Universidad EAN.
[16] Caren A. Wenner, C. G. (1998). Analyzing human error in aircraft ground damage incidents. Buffalo, USA: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 26 (2000) 177}199 p.179-180.
[17] D. Virovac, A. D. (2007). THE INFLUENCE OF HUMAN FACTOR IN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE. Zagreb, Croatia: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciencies p 259-261.
[18] KOZUBA, J. (2011). Impact of human factor on likelihood of aircraft accident. Dęblin, Poland: Faculty of Logistic and National Safety, Polish Air Force Academy p.31.
[19] Rashid, H. S. (210). Human Factors Effects in Helicopter Maintenance: Proactive Monitoring and Controlling Techniques. Cranfield, England: Cranfield University p. 28, 45
[20] SKYBRARY. (25 de 05 de 2016). www.skybrary.aero. Obtenido de www.skybrary.aero: https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/ICAO_SHELL_Model
[21] SKYBRARY. (20 de 09 de 2016). www.skybrary.aero. Obtenido de www.skybrary.aero: https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/PEAR_Model
[22] William B. Johnson, J. W. (2000). REDUCING INSTALLATION ERROR IN AIRLINE MAINTENANCE. USA: FAA.
[23] Xavier, A. J. (2005). MANAGING HUMAN FACTORS IN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE THROUGH A PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK. Daytona, USA: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University p. 14-18.
[24] ICAO. (14 de 11 de 2014). www.icao.int. Obtenido de www.icao.int: https://www.icao.int/SAM/Documents/2014-ADSAFASS/10_SMS.pdf