Training of scientific writers in times of Scimago

Main Article Content

José Alexander Díaz González

Abstract

The following document describes the written experience that, from the subject Written Communication and Readers Processes (Ceplec), was designed to articulate the research culture, with the purpose of doing an initial training in scientific writing. To begin with, there is a need to direct the course in the
training of scientific writers, reflecting briefly on the unbalanced relationship between doing science and registering or bureaucratising science; after that, the didactic strategy is presented; the development of the experience is illustrated below, illustrating some class fragments and their importance. Finally, we
reflect on why it is important to think about written culture as a necessary competence in the training of young researchers.

References

Barrera Luna, R. (2013). El concepto de la Cultura: definiciones, debates y usos sociales. Revista de Claseshistoria, 1-24.

Ferreiro Gravié, R. (2017). ¿Cómo ser maestro investigador? Bogotá: UNIMINUTO

La rotta, G. (2014). Dinámicas y Estructuración de los Semilleros de Investigación. Bogotá: Universidad Libre.

Moreno González, A. (2013). La cultura como agente del cambio social. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 95-110.

Morin, E. (2001). Los siete saberes necesarios para la educación del futuro. Bogotá: Editorial Magisterio.

Sánchez Upegui, A. A. (2011). Manual de Redacción Académica e Investigativa: cómo escribir, evaluar y publicar articulos. Cali : Universidad Católica del Norte.

UNIMINUTO. (s. f). Especiales Uniminuto . Obtenido de http://especiales.uniminuto.edu/file.php/1/Textos/anexo_1.pdf