Temporary assessment of the socio-environmental sound impact, in the influence area of the former Mariscal Sucre Airport in Quito
Main Article Content
Abstract
The impact of environmental noise after the transfer of the old Mariscal Sucre Airport from Quito to Tababela in 2013 was evaluated in two periods, in order to know the changes of environmental noise in decibels (dBA) in the area, in addition to determining the changes in auditory perception experienced by people living in the study area. To this end, noise measurement data from the area recorded in previous studies carried out by the International SEK University (UISEK) were reviewed, comparing them with current experimental measurement values, which constituted a first quantitative evaluation. Additionally, perception surveys were carried out on people who reside or work in the sector, constituting a qualitative evaluation. The quantitative sampling was carried out during the seven days of the week from Monday to Sunday from 7:00 to 23:59, obtaining, as a result, the decrease of environmental noise in a weekly average of 6% in comparison with the study carried out in 2011 by César Andrade. With the qualitative data it was determined that the perception of noise decreased in the sector, 39% of the population perceives that the noise has dropped, generating greater acoustic comfort, 33% of the surveyed population commented that, to date, they have no effects in health, so it can be concluded that the location of the old airport in the urban area disturbed the good living of the locals, with environmental noise being a control parameter for the location of this type of infrastructure
References
Andrade, A., & Coral, I. N. G. K. (2011). Mapa de ruido de la red vial del D.M.Q. Universidad Internacional SEK. Retrieved from http://repositorio.uisek.edu.ec/handle/123456789/176
Berglund, B., Lindvall, T., & Schwela, D. (2000). New WHO guidelines for community noise. Noise & Vibration Worldwide, 31(4), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1260/0957456001497535
De Esteban Alonso, A. (2003). Contaminación acústica y salud. Contaminación Acústica Y Salud Noise Pollution and Health Alfonso, 20.
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). (2012). ARC GIS 10.1 (Redlands). CA.
Griffiths, M. (2009). Environmental noise. Postnote, (338), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NCQ.0000324585.68966.51
Herrera, M. (2011). Fórmula para cálculo de la muestra poblaciones finitas. Hospital de Roosvelt, 2. Retrieved from https://investigacionpediahr.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/formula-para-cc3a1lculo-de-la-muestra-poblaciones-finitas-var-categorica.pdf
MAE, M. del A. (2015). Acuerdo Ministerial 097-A. Quito.
Morillas, A. (2016). Muestreo En Poblaciones Finitas. Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 298(1), 2171–2181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1660
Muzet, A. (2007). Environmental noise, sleep and health. Sleep Medicine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2006.09.001
Paulo Henrique Trombetta Zannin, Fabiano Belisário Diniz, Alfredo Calixto, W. A. B. (2001). Environmental Noise Pollution in Residential Areas of the City of Curitiba Paulo. Acustica, 87(8583), 407–413.
Restrepo, F., Osorio, J. D., & Patiño Valencia, B. A. (2011). Valoración económica del ruido: una revisión analítica de estudios. Semestre Económico, 14, 25. https://doi.org/0120-6346
Villavicencio, E. (2011). El tamaño muestral en tesis de post grado. ¿Cuantas personas debo encuestar? In ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3337.2243