Locke and the defects of communication

Abstract

In this paper I aim to argue if words means ideas, according to John Locke’s philosophy of language, then there is not same meaning for speakers; still if there are two meanings at least, then it is impossible that they are identical. This point out a defect to carry out the main function of language: communication. The issues that support this view are following: (I) words meaning the ideas of mind but not real objects in external world, for latter are unknowable; (ii) although there is a skepticism about real objects’ essences, it is possible to communicate through nominal essences; (iii) by rectification theory it makes clear that ideas are not communicated in public discourse, but there is communication however; and (iv) on communication it is no likely that speakers share same meanings to same words.